5 min read
How to Write YouTube Scripts
If you're a seasoned YouTuber, you're well aware of the vital role a video script plays in creating engaging and coherent content. A well-crafted...
3 min read
Writing Team
:
Aug 25, 2023 11:14:43 AM
A silent revolution is sweeping across social spheres, spearheaded by a groundbreaking EU law that is reshaping the way social media users interact with mainstream platforms.
This development empowers users within the European Union to reclaim control over their digital experiences and opt out of the attention-grabbing clutches of AI-driven algorithms.
Thanks to the introduction of the Digital Services Act (DSA), users of prominent platforms like Meta's Facebook and Instagram, ByteDance's TikTok, and Snap's Snapchat can exercise the right to reject personalized content feeds that rely on tracking users' behaviors.
Instead, they can opt for a simpler, chronological news feed that showcases posts from friends, free from the influence of AI algorithms. This monumental regulatory shift has far-reaching implications, extending beyond the EU as tech giants seek to streamline compliance efforts globally.
Anticipating the DSA compliance deadline, Facebook preemptively rolled out a chronological Feeds tab worldwide, signaling a commitment to offering users a choice in viewing non-personalized content. This underscores the significance of the EU law in compelling major platforms to provide alternatives to algorithm-based content curation.
The new chronological Facebook news feed notably eliminates "Suggested For You" posts entirely, a separation enforced by the DSA's provisions. This distinct line between tracking-based content suggestions and non-personalized selections is a testament to the law's commitment to safeguarding user agency against invasive AI surveillance.
YouTube also joined the movement, announcing that users who deactivate the 'watch history' feature will no longer receive video recommendations based on their past viewing patterns. This change, while seemingly applicable globally, is clearly influenced by the DSA's principles.
One might ask: why does the ability to disable profiling-based content recommendations matter? In the grand scheme of platform power, it's a minor detail, right? Yes and no. The supremacy of platforms in maintaining user engagement within their digital walled gardens is achieved through various factors, including the immense asymmetry of information they possess, allowing them to track users' clicks, engagements, searches, and more.
The content served based on such tracking doesn't require sophistication; it can feel rudimentary, often producing perplexing results. For instance, after watching a cat video on Instagram, users might find themselves inundated with an endless stream of feline-related content. This seemingly never-ending cycle of suggested cat videos highlights the crude nature of such algorithmic programming.
The arrival of DSA compliance has provided a welcomed solution. Instagram's users can finally revel in a fur-free browsing experience. The platform's home feed now offers two choices: "Following" and "For you." While the latter still contains a fair share of feline companions, users can now opt to see only content from accounts they actively follow, bypassing content strategically selected to commandeer their attention.
Facebook's reintroduction of a chronological news feed offers a similar sense of liberation. The platform momentarily transforms into a different product, with friends' posts receiving a fairer chance at visibility instead of being buried by algorithmic engagement filters.
The impact is significant across platforms, extending even to TikTok, where the AI-driven algorithm plays a crucial role in driving viral trends and platform popularity. However, the DSA only requires platforms to provide non-profiling-based options, leaving it to users to decide if they wish to engage with them.
While the immediate impact might not be seismic, the ability to quiet quit algorithms is a monumental shift in platform dynamics. This change aligns with the unbundling of platform power, supported by the DSA's provisions that extend beyond user choice to address systemic risks and enable external research into the impacts of AI technology.
This newfound empowerment is long overdue, and it marks a significant step towards rectifying the information asymmetry that has allowed tech giants to profit at the expense of users' attention. It's high time they gave back, and users now possess a simple means to halt content targeting systems from hijacking their precious time.
The trend of quietly quitting algorithms might not go viral, but its implications for user autonomy and platform accountability are profound. As the digital landscape continues to evolve, the user-centric approach championed by the DSA could serve as a model for future regulatory developments worldwide.
5 min read
If you're a seasoned YouTuber, you're well aware of the vital role a video script plays in creating engaging and coherent content. A well-crafted...
4 min read
'Tis the season when social media surges with engagement, and as seasoned social media strategists, we know exactly why. It's the time when the stars...
3 min read
Maintaining consumer engagement is crucial for brands. The focus has often been on how to attract and retain customers, but a recent study...
8 min read
In the landscape of social media, one trend has captured the attention of both individuals and businesses: ephemeral content. This dynamic form of...
3 min read
Meta, a frontrunner in the competitive landscape of generative AI technology, is making waves by adopting an open source strategy. Building on...
2 min read
If you're in TikTok, you suddenly, randomly care about southern sorority hopefuls. Chalk it up to the "Bama Rush" trend.